The Folder of Ever-Selfs

The first time it happened, Garrett was indexing laughter.

That week, his task queue included “Midwestern Mourning Speech (1950s–present),” “Dog Whimpers During Fireworks,” and “Household Silence (Intentional).” He tagged each audio byte with mood suggestions (wistful-ache, grief-not-yet-processed, unapologetic-boredom) and hit submit. But then came the laughter. It was tagged incorrectly, it was always tagged incorrectly. The algorithm mistook belly-laughs for grief-heaves. Mistook grief-heaves for sneeze.

And so Garrett listened. And re-tagged. And wondered if maybe they were the same thing.

At the edge of campus the Data Dome looked like an unrolled aluminum scroll. Smooth and blinking and suspiciously well-kept. On its entrance, a polite sign that read: UNIVERSITY ARCHIVAL PROJECT: Memory Retrieval in Contextual Environments. Below that: All Entry Voluntary • All Exits Monitored. Garrett swiped in. Said hi to Janice. Poured decaf into a chipped mug that once said: WORLD’S OKAYEST ADJUNCT.

He liked the job in the way one likes the ghost-light in a locked theater. It kept you company while reminding you nobody else was coming. Most of the team had moved to remote placements—cheaper for the university—but Garrett insisted on working in-lab. The Dome’s silence felt closer than the quiet in his apartment, where the refrigerator hummed with too much confidence and the cat sat like a disapproving unpaid intern.

Today’s folder was titled “Hollowed Appetites.” Inside: thirty thousand images of meals mid-consumption. The metadata tagged them with date, location, facial temperature, and—his favorite—digital utensil orientation. Garrett stared at a woman eating oatmeal. Her face pixel-soft. Her expression somewhere between intention and distraction. In the background: a toddler holding a tablet to the dog’s face. Caption: [canine eye tracking inconsistent w/ stimulation].

Garrett whispered, “You and me both.”

When they first told him about the Project, the pitch felt straightforward. Preserve our times by preserving how we feel them. Capture the affective landscape before it’s paved over by flatlined language and autocorrected grief. Garrett, then a grad student just teetering out of dissertation purgatory, thought, Why not? He already lived inside his screen. Now someone would pay him for it.

But he hadn’t anticipated the closeness. The stickiness of unnamed feelings. The way a stranger’s screen recording—showing their cursor hesitating for 19 seconds over “I miss you”—could feel like a love letter to the void.

Each week he was assigned a new cluster. Each cluster had a mood. Each mood was a mirror Garrett didn’t know he was looking into.

The folder named “Casual Disclosures” was the beginning of the trouble.

Within: thousands of audio snippets from smart speakers across the continent. Small admissions. “I think I’m done pretending I like my boss.” “I sometimes rehearse my order three times before I say it.” “I don’t think he meant to lie but he didn’t mean to tell the truth either.” Garrett catalogued them diligently. Flagged ones with anomalies. Paused extra long on the ones that sounded like something his ex would say.

But on Friday, one file opened and instead of a voice, there was a mirror.

Not literally—just the feeling.

A boy saying, “I know they’re listening. But I need someone to hear me anyway.”

The ethics briefings insisted no one listened long. Tag. Submit. Move on. Empathy, they said, should be practiced with professional distance. But there was no training manual for recognizing your own handwriting in a decades-old scanned journal entry filed under “Suburban Adolescence (Late Late Millennials).”

Garrett didn’t remember writing it. But he remembered the feeling: “Dear not-God, today I tried to see how long I could go without blinking. The world kept moving anyway.”

He clicked through more. A voicemail to a dead pet. A faceless girl recording herself saying “I forgive you” and then immediately deleting the file. A gif of someone crying in a CVS aisle between shampoo and lint rollers. Caption: [why here].

Garrett was supposed to tag these with categories like consumer-breakdown (private-public) and grief-performative (failed-upload). But instead he clicked play again. And again.

By winter, he’d stopped pretending it was just a job.

He came in earlier. Stayed longer. Made spreadsheets of emotional tones that never existed in DSMs. Grief-fog. Nostalgia-backwash. Optimism-too-late. He dreamt of a folder where everyone’s sadness lined up and made a shape. Not a tragic one. Just recognizably human. Like a shopping cart abandoned at the edge of a parking lot. Not empty. Not full. Just waiting for someone else to decide where it goes next.

Janice finally noticed.

“You doing okay, G?”

He shrugged. Tried not to say I’ve begun to love the voices more than the people they belong to. Instead he said, “I’ve been thinking a lot about how many apologies never land.”

She didn’t ask for clarification. Just nodded. “Try the sunflower folder tomorrow. That one’s got birthday wishes in it. It helps.”

In April, the new directive came through: Due to recent litigation regarding unconsented data fragments, we are implementing an audit system. Analysts will now be randomly recorded during work hours.

Garrett didn’t say anything. Just logged into his terminal. Opened the folder marked “Unspoken Hopes (misc).” Found a file of a boy naming planets he made up as a child.

“This one’s called Restitia. You can’t live on it. But you can visit. If you’re very, very quiet.”

He clicked play and whispered back, “I hear you.”

Read more from Issue No. 38 or share on X.